This past October I presented a paper at our district’s pastors’ conference titled, “Neither Papistic nor Karlstadtian: Luther’s Principles of Adiaphora Applied to the Liturgical Life of the Church.” I’ve already posted the paper and described the assignment in a previous post. In this post, I’d like to expand on one of the discussions that took place during the “Question and Answer” session after the essay was presented.
For those who haven’t yet checked out the essay, I’ll provide a short summary here. The paper had to do with Luther’s comments about adiaphora (Christian freedom) as it applies to worship. Since there are no “worship laws” in the New Testament, there is not a set form that Christians must follow when they gather for public worship. But Luther recognized that it is not necessarily beneficial for every church to do its own thing. Luther encouraged a general commonality in practice, particularly for churches that were located in the same region. His concern was for the lay people, who would be easily confused – understandably so – if churches that otherwise shared a common confession of faith used worship practices that were greatly different from one another. The essay quoted Luther extensively, and then considered how we could put Luther’s concepts into practice in our own day and within our own church body.
One of the pastors who spoke during the question and answer period asked about the practice of sermons that seemed more like a Bible Class — more of a time to study and learn about the Word, and less of a time for straight proclamation of the Word. The pastor who spoke was not in favor of sermons in a Bible study style, and (if my memory is correct) he thought that it might be an example of differing practices that would cause confusion for the lay people of our churches. He sensed that Bible study style sermons were becoming more common, and wondered what my thoughts were on that particular issue.
I was glad this issue was raised. Even though it wasn’t on my mind when I wrote the paper, it has been on my mind frequently in the past. I can’t remember how many times others (both pastors and laypeople) have also made comments (both positive and negative) about sermons that were more like Bible classes. Those in favor of a Bible study style sermon believe that it’s just another way to get people into the Word of God. Those who are against it haven’t always been able to identify what they consider the problem to be, but they have sensed that something just isn’t quite right about the concept. I am oversimplifying the situation a bit and lumping reactions into one of two groups, but those two groups of reactions have been common in my discussions with others. Read More…

RSS - Posts



